Faculty and course leaders
See where each student and each team needs business teaching, and give fast, market-grade feedback to a whole course without a consultant in every room.
Two tools for STEM faculties, incubators and investors. The Business Readiness Test shows whether a team is ready to run a venture. Strategy Lab turns the team's plan into a business plan twin that is challenged, stress-tested and improved until it holds.
Universities produce some of the most promising technology in Europe, and most of it comes from people who have never run a business. The engineering is often excellent. The business logic is usually untested.
Two questions decide whether a young venture is worth backing, and both are hard to answer from a pitch deck. Is this the right team to take the idea to market? And will the plan survive contact with the market, its customers, its costs and its shocks? Faculty rarely have the time to coach every team through both questions, and the feedback students need most, the way an investor or a buyer would read their plan, usually arrives too late or not at all.
Strategy Lab gives every team that read early, quickly and at scale, and gives the people running the program a common, comparable view of every team and every idea.
See where each student and each team needs business teaching, and give fast, market-grade feedback to a whole course without a consultant in every room.
Rank a cohort on team readiness and plan viability before deciding where coaching hours, lab space and mentors go.
Receive plans that have already been challenged, stress-tested and made consistent, with a comparable view across teams instead of a stack of decks.
Students, researchers and faculty with a technology and no business background.
Is this the right team? 20 to 30 minutes per person, a combined team map.
Pre-qualified ideas, comparable across teams, ready for coaching or funding.
Is this the right team?
A 20 to 30 minute computer-adaptive test of business acumen for people who have never run a business, with a personal report for each person and a combined map for each team.
Every person behind an idea answers about 40 questions in 20 to 30 minutes. The test is computer-adaptive: each answer sets the difficulty of the next question, so it homes in on a person's real level quickly instead of serving everyone the same paper. A strong engineer who has never seen a profit and loss statement is not lost, and a student who has already run a small business is not bored.
Questions mix concepts, short business cases and numbers, from reading a simple P&L to pricing a product, choosing a sales channel or estimating how long the cash will last. None of it needs prior business study, and none of it is about memorising definitions.
Correct, next question harder Wrong, next question easier
The test reads business acumen across six domains, each built from micro skills, so the feedback is specific enough to act on: not "learn finance", but "learn to plan cash month by month".
Market sizing · Competitive positioning · Business model choice · Timing and trends
Customer segmentation · Value proposition · Channel choice · Pricing logic
Unit economics · Reading a P&L · Cash runway · Break-even
Supply and sourcing · Scaling production · Quality and service · Make or buy
Hiring the first team · Roles and decisions · Incentives · Working with partners
IP basics · Contracts and liability · Funding options · Investor readiness
Each person gets a readiness profile: an overall score with a band from Exploring to Ready to launch, a chart of the six domains, the strongest and weakest micro skills and three concrete next steps.
It is feedback, not a verdict. The register is encouraging on purpose: the point is to show a gifted engineer exactly which piece of business knowledge to pick up next, not to grade them out of a program.
Ready to test
Ventures are rarely built by one person. When three or four people stand behind the same idea, everyone takes the test, and the team gets a combined map. It shows who covers finance, who covers technology and delivery, who covers customers, where the team overlaps and, most importantly, where the whole team has a blind spot.
That turns the question "is this the right team?" into something a team can act on: learn it, recruit it or bring in a partner for it. In the example, a strong engineering team with a good field researcher has nobody who is comfortable with contracts, IP and investors, long before that gap would show up in a funding round.
Blind spot: Risk, legal and funding. Nobody in the team scores above 38. Illustrative
Program leads see every person and every team on a common scale. That shows where a cohort needs teaching, which teams need a co-founder with a business profile, and which are ready for the next step. Because the results flow straight into Strategy Lab, the same view later adds how consistent and how resilient each plan is.
Team readiness, 0 to 100 Illustrative
Will this plan hold?
An AI-supported, human-monitored simulator that turns a team's idea into a business plan twin, finds the conflicts inside it and puts it through the shocks a real business meets, before the market does.
Engineers know digital twins: a living model of a machine that can be run, stressed and improved without touching the real thing. A business plan twin does the same for a venture. It holds the team's mission, goals, customers, assumptions and numbers in one connected model, so a change in one place shows up everywhere it matters.
The twin is built in five steps that loop. Teams are meant to go round more than once: every pass makes the plan more consistent, more resilient and easier to explain.
Business
plan twin
A guided submission asks what a good investor would ask: what is the idea, what are the mission, vision and values, what do you want to achieve and by when, who is the customer, what are the key success factors and the main risks, and what do you assume about price and cost.
Teams answer in free text or attach what they already have for any question: a business plan, a concept note, a product description, a pitch deck. Nobody needs to learn a template first.
With the support of AI, Strategy Lab reads everything the team submitted and plays the plan back visually: here is your mission statement, your value proposition, your customer, your goals and your key success factors, written clearly and side by side.
The team then agrees or adjusts each item with simple scales, sliders and choices. Seeing their own plan restated is often the first moment a team notices that its members had different plans in mind.
Give every small farm affordable, real-time certainty about the water it uses.
AgreeAdjustFamily farms of 5 to 50 hectares in the pilot region, buying through cooperatives.
AgreeAdjustThe consistency check surfaces the 6 to 10 most important conflicts between what a team says it wants and what its own plan implies. A revenue goal that would mean owning half of the market. A mission to serve everyone next to a price only the largest buyers can pay. A green mission next to a supply chain that flies parts around the world.
For each finding the team makes a choice: go back and rewrite the submission, or write a short answer on why it does not apply or how it will be solved. Either way, the team has to think it through, much as it would in front of an investor.
Your goal is 10 million euros of revenue in year three. Your own market estimate is 20 million euros a year, so the plan assumes half of the market within three years.
What would make that share realistic, or which goal fits the market you describe?
Revise the planAnswer the findingThe mission is a sensor every small farm can afford. The price point in the plan is 2,400 euros per unit, which only large farms in the survey said they would pay.
Which matters more for year one: the mission price or the margin?
Revise the planAnswer the findingSustainability is one of your three values, yet every unit is assembled overseas and shipped by air to customers in Europe.
Is there a supply option that fits your values, and what does it cost?
Revise the planAnswer the findingThen the twin meets the real world. Strategy Lab selects 6 to 8 stress scenarios that fit the venture: a key input cost rises, energy prices double, the currency swings, demand turns out far lower than planned, half of the team leaves, rules tighten, a funding round slips.
Clicking a stress shows what it does to the key success factors, the KPIs and the financials, from margin to cash runway and break-even. Two stresses can be combined, because bad news rarely comes alone. Try it on the example: pick one or two stresses and watch the plan.
Pick up to two stresses Interactive example, illustrative numbers
The plan holds. Pick a stress to see what the lab would ask next.
Teams are encouraged to go back and change whatever is variable: the business plan, the statements, the price, the supply chain, the timeline. Each round is scored again, so the team sees its plan become more consistent and more resilient, round by round.
That is the heart of the method. The learning happens in the rework, not in the first submission.
Consistency Resilience Illustrative
After several rounds, the team holds a pre-qualified, consistent and stress-tested picture of its venture: the concept, the company and the plan, with every interdependency checked.
Real-time water quality for small farms
Affordable, real-time certainty about farm water.
Family farms of 5 to 50 hectares, via cooperatives.
2.5 million euros revenue in year three, 900 farms.
Sensor at 690 euros plus 9 euros a month for data.
Field accuracy · cooperative partner · unit cost under 300 euros
Funding delay beyond six months still breaks the runway.
Illustrative
A good pitch can hide a weak plan, and a shy team can hide a strong one. Because every team goes through the same test and the same lab, program leads get a comparable view of every idea: how ready the team is, how consistent its plan is, how well it survives stress and how complete it is.
Universities use it to decide where teaching and coaching go. Incubators use it to choose a cohort. Investors and corporate venture teams use it to see which plans have already done their homework.
| # | Team | Ready | Consistent | Resilient | Complete | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Team DeltaWater quality sensor for small farms | 58 | 81 | 74 | 88 | 75 |
| 2 | Team OrbitBattery health analytics for e-bike fleets | 66 | 72 | 61 | 79 | 70 |
| 3 | Team HelixLow-cost lab diagnostics kit | 49 | 64 | 55 | 70 | 60 |
| 4 | Team ArcHeat recovery for small data rooms | 71 | 58 | 49 | 62 | 60 |
| 5 | Team LumenSmart lighting retrofit for schools | 44 | 52 | 46 | 55 | 49 |
Illustrative
We use AI where it is strong, and we say so: reading long documents, structuring a plan, spotting conflicts and running the scenario arithmetic for every team at once. That is what makes instant feedback possible for a whole course.
What we do not do is hand the judgement to a model. Techtone people monitor every run in the background, cross-check the findings and the iterations, and step in when a result does not make sense. Our team comes from strategy consulting and works every day with how markets, boards and investors think, and that experience is built into the questions, the findings and the stress scenarios.
Reads and structures every submission · finds the conflicts · runs the stress arithmetic · keeps every round comparable
Choose the stresses that fit the venture · review the findings · cross-check every iteration · brief faculty on the results
We provide and host both tools, set up the cohort, monitor every run and send the program leads the team maps, the business plan twins and the ranked pipeline, with a short debrief.
We believe the tools do the most good when as many teams as possible use them, and we cannot be in every classroom. So we train faculty, teaching assistants and program managers to run them themselves.
A living, connected model of a team's business plan: its mission, goals, customers, assumptions and numbers in one place, so a change in one part shows up everywhere it matters. Teams challenge it, stress-test it against shocks and improve it round by round before the market does.
Each answer sets the difficulty of the next question, so the test homes in on a person's real level in about 40 questions instead of serving everyone the same paper. The result is a readiness score with a band, a profile across six business domains and the micro skills to work on next.
By putting every team through the same test and the same simulator, then comparing them on common scales: team readiness, plan consistency, resilience under stress and completeness. That ranks the pipeline, not the pitch.
The Business Readiness Test takes 20 to 30 minutes per person. Strategy Lab runs as one interactive session of 2 to 4 hours, or as several shorter rounds spread across a course.
No. Teams can answer the questions in free text, and attach a business plan, concept note, product description or pitch deck only if they already have one.
No. The AI reads the material, structures the plan, finds conflicts and runs the scenario arithmetic. Techtone experts monitor every run and cross-check the findings and iterations; judgement stays with people.
Yes. After a train the trainer session of a few hours and the first one or two iterations run together, faculty run the tools within their own courses, with Techtone support on the technology and on reading the results.
It is built for founders without a business background, which is why STEM students, researchers and faculties are the core audience. It works for any team with an idea and no prior entrepreneurial experience.
A team map for every team and a cohort view that ranks ideas by team readiness, plan consistency, resilience under stress and completeness, so coaching time and funding go where they matter most.
Tell us about your program, your students and your timeline. We will show you both tools on a live example and suggest how to run the first cohort.